science

Les différences entre les cerveaux des primates – humains, singes et singes – ont été révélées

Une nouvelle étude a examiné les différences et les similitudes entre les cellules du cortex préfrontal – la zone frontale du cerveau, la région qui joue un rôle central dans les fonctions cognitives supérieures – entre les humains et les primates non humains tels que les chimpanzés, les macaques rhésus, et ouistitis. .

Une nouvelle étude a révélé que les cerveaux des humains et des primates non humains peuvent être remarquablement similaires, malgré leurs différences physiques distinctes. Cependant, les plus petits changements peuvent faire des différences significatives dans les troubles du développement et les troubles mentaux.

Comprendre les différences moléculaires qui rendent le cerveau humain unique peut aider les scientifiques à étudier les troubles de son développement. Une nouvelle étude étudie les différences et les similitudes entre les cellules du cortex préfrontal – la région frontale du cerveau, la région qui joue un rôle clé dans les fonctions cognitives supérieures – entre les humains et les primates non humains tels que les chimpanzés, les macaques rhésus et les ouistitis . Récemment publié dans le magazine les sciencesL’étude a été menée par une équipe de chercheurs, dont Andre Souza, professeur de neurosciences à l’Université du Wisconsin-Madison.

Les différences cellulaires entre ces espèces peuvent expliquer les étapes de leur développement et comment ces différences peuvent être impliquées dans des troubles, tels que l’autisme et les déficiences intellectuelles, observés chez l’homme. Souza, qui étudie la biologie évolutive du cerveau au Centre Weizmann de l’Université de Washington-Madison, a décidé de commencer à étudier et à classer les cellules du cortex préfrontal en partenariat avec[{ » attribute= » »>Yale University lab where he worked as a postdoctoral researcher.

Human Chimpanzee Macaque Marmoset Brains

Researchers analyzed genetic material from cells in the prefrontal cortex (the area shaded in each brain) from four closely-related primates to characterize subtle differences in cell type and genetics. University of Wisconsin-Madison

“We are profiling the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex because it is particularly interesting. This cortical area only exists in primates. It doesn’t exist in other species,” Sousa says. “It has been associated with several relevant functions in terms of high cognition, like working memory. It has also been implicated in several neuropsychiatric disorders. So, we decided to do this study to understand what is unique about humans in this brain region.”

Sousa and his lab collected genetic information from more than 600,000 prefrontal cortex cells from tissue samples from humans, chimpanzees, macaques and marmosets. They analyzed that data to categorize the cells into types and determine the differences in similar cells across species. Unsurprisingly, the vast majority of the cells were fairly comparable.

“Most of the cells are actually very similar because these species are relatively close evolutionarily,” Sousa says.

Andre Sousa

Andre Sousa. Credit: Photo by Andy Manis

Sousa and his collaborators found five cell types in the prefrontal cortex that were not present in all four of the species. They also found differences in the abundances of certain cell types as well as diversity among similar cell populations across species. When comparing a chimpanzee to a human the differences seem huge — from their physical appearances down to the capabilities of their brains. But at the cellular and genetic level, at least in the prefrontal cortex, the similarities are many and the dissimilarities sparing.

“Our lab really wants to know what is unique about the human brain. Obviously from this study and our previous work, most of it is actually the same, at least among primates,” Sousa says.

The slight differences the researchers found may be the beginning of determining some of those unique factors, and that information could lead to revelations about development and developmental disorders at a molecular level.

“We want to know what happened after the evolutionary split between humans and other primates,” Sousa says. “The idea is you have a mutation in a gene or in several genes and those genes now have slightly different functions. But if these genes are relevant for brain development, for example, how many of a certain cell is produced, or how cells are connecting to other cells, how is it affecting the neuronal circuitry and their physiological properties? We want to understand how these differences lead to differences in the brain and then lead to differences we can observe in adults.”

The study’s observations were made in the brains of adults, after much of the development is complete. This means that the differences may be occurring during the brain’s development. So, the researchers’ next step is to study samples from developing brains and extend their area of investigation past the prefrontal cortex to potentially find where and when these differences originate. The hope is that this information will lead to a more robust foundation to lay developmental disorder research on top of.

“We are able to do extraordinary things, right? We are studying life itself, the universe, and so much more. And this is really unique when you look around,” says Sousa, whose team included graduate students Ryan Risgaards and Zachary Gomez-Sanchez, research intern Danielle Schmidt, and undergraduate students Ashwin Debnath and Cade Hottman. “If we have these unique abilities, it has to be something in the brain, right? There is something in the brain that allows us to do all of that and we are really interested in knowing what it is.”

For more on this research, see New Clues to What Makes the Human Brain Different.

Reference: “Molecular and cellular evolution of the primate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex” by Shaojie Ma, Mario Skarica, Qian Li, Chuan Xu, Ryan D. Risgaard, Andrew T. N. Tebbenkamp, Xoel Mato-Blanco, Rothem Kovner, Željka Krsnik, Xabier de Martin, Victor Luria, Xavier Martí-Pérez, Dan Liang, Amir Karger, Danielle K. Schmidt, Zachary Gomez-Sanchez, Cai Qi, Kevin T. Gobeske, Sirisha Pochareddy, Ashwin Debnath, Cade J. Hottman, Joshua Spurrier, Leon Teo, Anthony G. Boghdadi, Jihane Homman-Ludiye, John J. Ely, Etienne W. Daadi, Da Mi, Marcel Daadi, Oscar Marín, Patrick R. Hof, Mladen-Roko Rasin, James Bourne, Chet C. Sherwood, Gabriel Santpere, Matthew J. Girgenti, Stephen M. Strittmatter, André M. M. Sousa and Nenad Sestan, 25 August 2022, Science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.abo7257

READ  Un examen indépendant du budget et du calendrier de retour des échantillons de Mars de la NASA a conclu que c'était « irréaliste ».

Delphine Perrault

"Solutionneur de problèmes extrêmes. Chercheur avide de bacon. Écrivain maléfique. Geek du Web. Défenseur des zombies depuis toujours."

Articles similaires

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Bouton retour en haut de la page
Fermer
Fermer